“Haiti, the United States, and the ‘Sacredness’ of Human Life”
The sacredness of human life has no nationality. We must be more serious and consistent when we speak about the sacredness of human life and the responsibility we share as individuals and citizens to protect it and deploy all various kinds of human power and resources towards that goal. A morally responsible imagination begins with fundamental questions: Who belongs within the circle of humanity? Are certain lives treated as more sacred than others? By what moral measure do we judge the worth, dignity, and protection owed to human beings?
As a nation, we must continue asking these profound moral and existential questions as we continue to understand ourselves and our institutions in the democratic sense. Honestly, we should not have to decide who is included within the circle of humanity. As a civilized people who cherish the inclusive nature of democracy and freedom, we should never have to decide that some lives deserve greater protection, dignity, or recognition than others.
Further, if we believe that a place, a community, or a particular country is considered too dangerous for one group of human beings, then we must acknowledge that the same dangers threaten all human beings who live in or travel to that place. For example, if the U.S. Department of State determines that Haiti is unsafe for American travelers, we must also recognize that such insecurity affects equally Haitians, Canadians, Britons, Jamaicans, and all others who enter or reside there. Haitians do not have a monopoly on suffering, nor do they voluntarily surrender their lives to violence and social and physical death. It seems to be that the dignity, safety, and security of human beings are shared universal concerns and values. We have to be consistent about the way we think about or imagine democracy morally and ethically.
The work of democracy calls us to be accountable, responsible, and ethical as individuals and citizens. The moral imagination of our democracy is intrinsically linked to the continuous process of individual and collective development, moral equality, human dignity, and moral responsibility. In the case of Haiti, I must say that Haiti is not a footnote to the history of the Americas or US history. It is one of the founding chapters. To understand the promise, contradictions, and unfinished work of democracy in the United States and throughout the Western Hemisphere, we must take Haiti seriously, not merely as an object of historical inquiry, but as an indispensable partner in shaping the democratic future of the Americas.
If we agree that all human lives are sacred, then all people deserve the right to security and protection regardless of their place of birth, origin, or the language they speak. If we also agree that a neighborhood in Chicago is considered too dangerous for one American citizen to visit, then the same conditions should concern every person who lives there, regardless of whether they are Black, white, Asian, or any other identity. If you and I hold that human vulnerability is universal, then our commitment to human dignity must be universal as well. Don’t you agree?
As a final note, you and I can agree on another proposition: A danger does not become more real because it threatens a foreigner, nor does it become less serious because it is endured by local residents. If we truly believe in the democratic ideals of this country and that democracy goes beyond the political system, then the right to live in safety, freedom, and dignity is not the privilege of any single nation, culture, religion, or race. Freedom, democracy, and human rights are not the property of any country, and no society possesses a monopoly on these ideals. They are universal principles that transcend borders and belong to the entire human family. I should also add that human rights are not (or should not be) determined by passports, race, geography, or citizenship. The sacredness of life is universal, and it has no frontier.
The pressing question we must then ask is not only whether a place is safe for visitors, but whether it is safe and dignified for the people who call that place home. We belong together. The cardinal belief that American citizens must “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” also makes a clarion call upon us to represent and expand the moral promise of democracy beyond this nation. This is the moral responsibility of democracy in the United States, and the unfinished work of every American generation is to expand the meaning of both.





